ABR Talent Logo
CS Insights | Expert Insights

Better Hires, Fewer Re-Hires

In fast-moving SaaS and tech startups, where every headcount matters, losing a hire early can mean lost progress and missed goals.
ABR Talent Blog Image of people walking fast

Why Recruitment Agencies Help You Build a Team That Stays

High turnover isn’t just a frustration for hiring managers, it’s a momentum killer. Replacing a hire who leaves too soon eats time, drains budget, and chips away at team morale. In fast-moving SaaS and tech startups, where every headcount matters, losing a hire early can mean lost progress and missed goals.

But there is an upside: companies that use recruitment agencies see their hires stay longer. Why? Because great recruiters vet for more than just CV buzzwords. They assess cultural alignment, long-term fit, and growth potential, so you’re not constantly rehiring for the same role three months later.

Let’s look at how recruiters drive retention and protect your hiring investment.

The Real Cost of a Bad Hire

A bad hire doesn’t just cost the salary. It hits your business in multiple ways: lost productivity, wasted onboarding, training sunk costs, and the opportunity cost of not having the right person in seat. The U.S. Department of Labor estimates a bad hire can cost at least 30% of that employee’s first-year salary [1].

Other studies put the damage even higher. SHRM suggests it could be as much as 50–60% [2]. In high-skill or revenue-generating roles, that number can rise to twice the salary when you factor in sales ramp delays or engineering delivery slips.

Agency Hires Are More Likely to Stay

Recruitment agencies don’t just speed up hiring, they improve its quality. According to industry benchmarks, over 90% of candidates placed by specialist recruiters are still in their roles after 12 months, compared to around 70% for in-house hires [3].

That’s a meaningful gap. It translates directly to less churn, lower cost-per-hire, and fewer business disruptions. Instead of managing exit interviews and repeat job ads, you’re onboarding, developing, and retaining.

Why the Difference?

Because recruiters vet more thoroughly. Great agencies assess skills and experience, cultural alignment, motivation and long-term ambition.

They dig deeper into fit, not just can they do the job, but will they thrive here long-term? This often includes probing for career goals, manager fit, and values alignment, factors often missed in rushed, in-house processes [4].

In contrast, in-house hiring teams often operate under time pressure. They may focus on shortlists from inbound applicants or prioritise speed over depth. The result? A higher likelihood of misalignment, disengagement, and quick exits.

Built-In Insurance: The Replacement Guarantee

Here’s another underrated advantage: many agencies offer a replacement guarantee. If the hire doesn’t work out within the first few months, they’ll replace them for free [5]. That’s not just peace of mind, it’s cost protection. It ensures you’re not paying twice for the same role.

No in-house team offers that.

Stability Matters More Than Ever

Team stability is a hidden growth lever. It improves morale, accelerates onboarding, and allows managers to focus on performance, not vacancies. When startups are scaling fast, even a couple of wrong hires can derail plans. A stable team, with the right players in place, keeps things moving.

Recruiters help make that happen by getting the fit right upfront. They’re not guessing. They’re curating talent based on thousands of hours of pattern recognition, network insight, and role-matching experience.

ROI That Lasts Beyond Day One

Better hiring isn’t just about day-one performance. It’s about staying power. When a new hire sticks, grows, and contributes over time, you maximise ROI on that headcount. Agencies aren’t just filling seats, they’re placing people who will stay, thrive, and scale with you.

So next time you’re deciding whether to post it and hope, or partner with a recruiter, ask yourself: what’s the cost of a re-hire?

References:

[1] Talentful (2023), “The Hidden Cost of a Bad Hire”, talentful.com

[2] SHRM (2023), “Cost of a Bad Hire”, shrm.org

[3] REC (2017), “Perfect Match Report”, rec.uk.com

[4] Gallup (2023), “What Makes a Great Hire?”, gallup.com

[5] Fountain (2024), “Recruitment Agency ROI Report”, fountain.com

Related